Build an MVP with a Low-Code Approach: A Guide to Low-Code MVP Development

Minimum Viable Product (MVP) is the simplest product version that includes only the essential features to attract early customers and validate a product idea early in the product development cycle. MVP aims to gather feedback from early users to make improvements before fully investing.

When creating an MVP, choosing between low-code and no-code platforms can make a huge difference in the development process. While no-code tools are great for non-technical users to build something easily and quickly, low-code platforms require and provide extra flexibility. Low-code allows you to add custom code, which means you can tweak your MVP exactly how you want, without worrying about time.

The magic of low-code lies in its ability to blur the lines between technical and non-technical teams. It empowers business users to actively participate in the development process while giving developers the control they need to craft customized, scalable solutions.

Here is an article on the differences between no-code and low-code for product development.

Here is an image showing low-code and no-code with emphasis on customization and flexibility

Why Choose Low-Code for MVP Development?

• More Control Over Customization: Low-code gives you the best of both worlds: fast development using visual tools and the ability to drop in custom code whenever needed. This flexibility lets you build an MVP that is not only functional but also scalable
  
• Scalability: With low-code, you can start from something small and then grow. An MVP built on a low-code platform isn’t just a temporary fix or solution. It provides a solid foundation that supports your product’s long-term vision and growth
  ‍
• Faster Iteration with Developer Input: Low-code platforms empower experienced developers to focus on high-impact areas, using their skills where it matters most while leveraging visual tools to handle routine or non-core tasks. This results in a development cycle that is not only faster but more precise
  ‍
• Efficient Collaboration Between Teams: Low-code environments allow developers, business users, and product managers to collaborate effectively exchanging ideas and skills to contribute to the development process
  ‍
• Integration Flexibility: Low-code platforms offer stronger API integration compared to no-code tools, which means you can build a more advanced MVP with ease. Whether you need to connect payment systems, external databases, or even add AI-powered features, low-code gives you the flexibility to integrate these services efficiently

Step-by-Step Guide to Building an MVP with Low-Code

• Define Key Functionalities with Flexibility in Mind: Start with your core product features but leave room for customization. Use the drag-and-drop interface to quickly build the foundation of your MVP, then add custom business logic where necessary

Example: For a SaaS product, you might prioritize user management and analytics. But if you need specialized reporting, a bit of custom code can make your MVP stand out.
‍

• Leverage Pre-Built Components with Custom Modifications: Low-code platforms come with pre-built components, e.g. login systems and data storage, for common tasks. Use them to get your MVP off the ground fast, then modify or add custom elements for features that make your product unique

Example: For a subscription model, you could use the platform’s pre-built user authentication, but customize the pricing models with your business logic.
‍

• Integrate APIs for Advanced Features: Low-code platforms allow you to connect with third-party APIs, giving you the ability to incorporate more sophisticated features early on. This could be anything from payment systems to AI-based recommendation engines

Example: For an e-commerce MVP, you can add advanced features like a personalized product recommendation system or dynamic pricing that changes based on factors like demand or customer behavior.
‍

• Test, Gather Feedback, and Adjust: Once your MVP is live, gather feedback from your early users. Low-code platforms make it easy to add new features or adjust existing ones based on user feedback, all while keeping developer input for technical fixes

Example: After launching a customer management app MVP, you can make changes to the reporting based on the feedback you get from users.
‍

Here is a flowchart showing the process of starting with pre-built components and adding custom code as the MVP evolves.

Image Source

Low-Code vs. Traditional Development for MVPs

• Speed with Flexibility: In low-code development, you can quickly create an MVP without starting from scratch while traditional development is slower because everything is built from the ground up
  ‍
• Reduced Development Bottlenecks: Low-code platforms eliminate many bottlenecks by automating routine tasks like setting up databases, creating basic forms, or integrating standard APIs. In traditional development, developers are responsible for every step of the process, from designing the user interface to writing the backend code
  ‍
• Long-Term Viability: Low code platform’s built-in tools allow you to add features, improve performance, and handle larger user bases as the product grows, making it a viable option for long-term use while traditional development offers long-term viability but with higher upfront costs and significant portions of code
  ‍
• Lowering Developer Workload: Low-code platforms take care of repetitive tasks, like designing standard UI elements, allowing developers to focus on high-level tasks while in traditional development, developers handle everything, from the simplest forms to the most complex algorithms  

Here is an article comparing low-code and traditional development

Here is a comparison of low-code vs traditional development timelines for MVPs

Challenges of Using Low-Code for MVPs

While low-code platforms offer many advantages, there are some challenges:

• Need for Technical Expertise: For more advanced logic, you will still need a developer to step in. Non-technical users may hit limitations when trying to build highly customized features
  ‍
• Platform Constraints: As your project progresses from its MVP stage to full-scale development, low-code platforms may present a series of challenges that can hinder scalability, flexibility, and customization
  ‍
• Cost Considerations Over Time: Although low-code platforms help you save time and money at the start, scaling up your product may lead to increased costs. As your app grows in complexity and user numbers, adding new features and maintaining the system can require more investment in terms of development resources, platform upgrades, or custom integrations
  ‍
• Learning Curve for Advanced Features: While low-code platforms simplify many development processes, integrating more advanced features or complex systems may require a deeper level of technical knowledge. This learning curve can potentially slow down non-developers when implementing sophisticated integrations

Here is a graphic highlighting potential bottlenecks when using low-code platforms (e.g., scalability, customization).

Conclusion

Low-code platforms are a fantastic option for building MVPs, offering a balance between speed and flexibility. With the ability to quickly develop a functional product while still customizing key features, low-code empowers businesses to validate ideas without sacrificing long-term growth potential.

If you need to quickly test an idea but plan on scaling and customizing as you go, low-code is the way to go!